Alexy II presents his vision of the “past, present and future” of the European Continent

Patriarch Aleksy II of Moscow and All Russia, who is on his first official visit to France since becoming the Head of the Russian Orthodox Church, has addressed the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe in Strasbourg. He put a special emphasis on moral standards as the main instrument for maintaining peace and assuring future development.
admin | 02 October 2007

Patriarch Aleksy II of Moscow and All Russia, who
is on his first official visit to France since becoming the Head of the
Russian Orthodox Church, has addressed the Parliamentary Assembly of
the Council of Europe in Strasbourg. He put a special emphasis on moral
standards as the main instrument for maintaining peace and assuring
future development.


The Address of Patriarch Alexy II of Moscow and All Russia to the PACE

Dear Mr. President,

Dear Members of the Parliamentary Assembly,


Thank you for the opportunity to speak to this high assembly as I have
been invited by the President of the Parliamentary Assembly of the
Council of Europe René van der Linden on behalf of you all. I am glad
to communicate our vision of the past, present and future of our common
home, the European Continent, to the members of parliaments of the
Council of Europe constituent countries.

Recently, the Council of Europe has made some new, unprecedented steps
towards bridging with religious communities. In our sight it is the
long-awaited response to many calls of religious leaders.

Understanding of human person could become an important theme for such
a dialogue since it is around anthropology that many problems and
sometimes even conflicts arise between faith traditions and secular
humanism.

The European Continent has been influenced by many cultures that are
present here until now. Yet it was within Christian system that the
vision of human person’s high dignity and of the conditions necessary
for its realization were shaped. The Christian faith taught all nations
that human beings are created in the image and likeness of God.
Christianity has always stressed that if human being lives a moral live
he or she may become God’s friend (cf. John 15.15) and achieve freedom
(cf. John 8.32).

Every honest specialist in European history may witness that the
Christian attitude to human person destroyed and condemned slavery,
formed means of fair judgment, created high social and political
standards of life, shaped ethical relations between persons, and
developed science and culture. The very conception of human rights,
Europe’s main political idea, has developed not without some influence
of Christian teaching of dignity, freedom, and moral character of human
being. From the very beginning human rights developed in the context of
Christian morality forming with it a kind of tandem.

Yet today there occurs a break between human rights and morality, and
this break threatens the European civilization. We can see it in a new
generation of rights that contradict morality, and in how human rights
are used to justify immoral behavior. In this connection, I may note
that morality, with which any human right advocacy has to count, is
mentioned in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights
and Fundamental Freedoms. I am convinced that the makers of the
European Convention on Human Rights included therein morality not as
something ambiguous but rather as an integral element of the whole
human rights system.

If we ignore moral norms, we ultimately ignore freedom too. Morality is
freedom in action. It is a freedom brought into reality as a result of
responsible choice, in which human person restricts his or her self for
the good of that very person and broader society. Moral principles
secure societal vitality and growth, as well as unity of society, which
is one of primary objectives of the European Convention on Human
Rights. And whenever moral norms are trespassed and declared to be
relative, it may undermine the whole worldview of the Europeans. They
may draw nigh to a disastrous moment when European nations risk losing
their spiritual and cultural identity and ultimately their own place in
history.

However I believe that no state power may interfere into human being’s
personal life. After all, being moral or immoral is a matter of free
personal choice. But in public sphere, both state and society should
encourage and support moral principles acceptable for the majority of
citizens. Therefore they should use mass media, social institutions,
and education system to pursue the moral ideals that are linked with
spiritual and cultural tradition of the European nations.

I believe that it is very important to preserve the moral dimension
that inspires and ennobles the European people’s lives in order to
safeguard the European cultural identity, especially in the context of
its contacts with other cultural and civilizational standards. At
least, no state power should be used to propagate or encourage things
that may weaken or destroy the society’s moral pillars.

Many societal problems have no solution unless human person, state
power, and nation as a whole are subject to moral evaluation. For
example, in Russia and many other European countries – both Eastern and
Western – the gap between the rich and the poor is growing while any
idea of social justice is blurring. In Russia, our church has many
times called to discuss the miserable condition of millions of honest
workers whose very few compatriots are extremely rich and glaringly
extravagant. We are glad to see this initiative supported by many
societal and political forces today. We can see that preconditions for
proper economical and political decisions are already there.

However, even the most efficient legal and social system is unable to
completely restrict some people’s lust to gain wealth at expense of
many others. Charity never arises whenever people do not feel
responsible for their fellow citizens. Charity is a result of
upbringing in the spirit of traditional moral principles, including
Christian ones.

Traditional moral principles are also a basis for integration within a
multicultural society, which today’s Europe actually is. It was well
demonstrated, for example, by the World Religious Summit held in Moscow
in June last year. The forum participants were Christian, Muslim,
Jewish, Buddhist, Shinto, and Hindu. They came from forty-nine
countries to express their common concern for the humanity’s moral
degradation.

It was upon this basis of traditional morality and respect for each
other’s social models and lifestyle that various religious traditions
coexisted in Russia, where no wars of religion were ever known. Now
too, our church keeps strengthening peace between the faiths through
developing an efficient dialogue and cooperation with other traditional
religious communities in Russian and other CIS countries.

As we all know, Europe and the whole world are today threatened with
the extremists and terrorists many of whom wear religious disguises.
These destructive forces grow on the soil of religious ignorance and
moral scarcity. Therefore I strongly believe that younger generations
should have access, if they will, to in-depth study their religious
tradition in school. They also need basic knowledge of other faiths
since it lays foundation for living together peacefully.

Technological progress calls us to look at human rights anew. The
believers have their say in the issues of bioethics, electronic IDs,
and other technologies that concern Christians. Human being should
remain what he or she is without becoming a commodity or a fully
controlled element in an electronic network or a subject for laboratory
experiments or a cyborg. That is why science and technology cannot be
estranged from the moral evaluation of their goals and fruits.

The Russian Orthodox Church if fully aware that there are a range of
religious world outlooks in Europe and world-widely. We are open for
dialogue with them as well as with those who adhere to secularism. Yet
we are convinced that no worldview, including secular one, must not
claim monopoly in Europe or elsewhere. Therefore we think that casting
religion out from public sphere is unacceptable. It is time to
acknowledge that religious motivation has its right to exist everywhere
including public sphere.

In order to avoid clashes between different worldviews we need a
serious dialogue between the cultures, in which representatives of both
traditional religions and the secular tradition should be most actively
involved. I believe that the Council of Europe, which has potential and
experience as a place of dialogue about European values, may become a
good forum for such a dialogue.


The Patriarch thanked the
parliamentarians for the opportunity to communicate the Russian
Orthodox Church’s “vision of the past, present and future of the
European Continent”.

He linked the conflicts that arise today with different views “of what
a human being is” and with “the gap between religious traditions and
secular humanism”. 

In this respect, he pointed to the breach between the existing concepts of human rights and morality:

“This is something that can be seen
in the emergence of a new generation of rights that contradict
morality, and philosophies that use human rights to justify immoral
behaviour. In this connection I would like to remind you that the
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms includes a reference to morality that has to be taken into
account by anyone involved in human rights advocacy,”
said Aleksy II.

The patriarch also noted the importance of inter-religious dialogue, which is essential in reaching and maintaining peace.

“Europe and the whole world are
threatened by extremists and terrorists. These destructive forces grow
on the soil of religious ignorance and lack of morality,”
he said.

He also spoke on the problem of the status of Serbia’s breakaway republic of Kosovo.

“We believe that the way to resolve
the issue around Kosovo involves establishing favorable conditions for
dialogue. And we need this, involving the mediation of the
international community. But that mediation has to unbiased and
constructive. That is the approach that will enhance the authority of
international mediation, because any kind of unilateral resolution, 
that doesn’t take into account the opinions of the Serbian people will
only result in injustice and suffering of people that will last for
many years,”
Alexey II said.      

Another important issue Aleksy II touched upon is the relationship between science and morality:

“A human being should remain a human
being, not a commodity, not a controlled element within an electronic
network, not a subject for laboratory experimentation, not a
semi-artificial entity. That’s why science and technology cannot be
estranged from moral evaluation”
.

Patriarch Alexy II of Moscow and All Russia, speaking at the Council of
Europe on Tuesday, reiterated the position of his Church that gay and
lesbian parades amount to “propaganda and advertisement of sin.”

“When persistent attempts were made to hold a homosexual parade in
Moscow, we believed that that meant propaganda and advertisement of
sin,” Alexy told a session of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council
of Europe (PACE) in Strasbourg, France.

Attempts are made to justify homosexuality by calling it a disease, the
patriarch said. Yet kleptomania can also be considered a disease, he
argued. “Why then no one advertises kleptomania while homosexuality
gets advertised via gay parades?” he said.

“It is advertisement that is being forced on people who are a very long way from it,” Alexy said.

The patriarch also said the Church commiserated with all sinners,
including homosexuals, “sinners whom we love while we hate their sin.”

“But at the same time, we Orthodox Christians cannot depart from what
is taught by the Bible and by the apostolic tradition of the Church,”
Alexy said.

“Somebody may think otherwise, and nobody must be discredited on the basis of the character of their private lives,” he said.

“In the same way, nobody must try to force me or my brothers and
sisters in faith to be silent and [to prevent us from] using the word
sin for something that is called sin in God’s Word,” the patriarch said.

It is the right of religious believers to question the acceptability of
legal and political support for a feature of society, he said.

Summing up, the Patriarch reiterated the readiness of the Russian
Orthodox Church for dialogue, adding that the Council of Europe could
be a powerful forum for discussing the most sensitive issues.

Source: Interfax-religion, Russia Today

Система Orphus Do you see a mistake in the text? Highlight it and click: Ctrl + Enter
Did you enjoy this article? Consider helping us!
Pravmir depends on your donations:
the more you give, the more we can do.
Other amount
Paypal.com
20 $
Paypal.com
50 $
Paypal.com
100 $
Paypal.com
Dear Friends,

Our website exists owing to your generous assistance, thanks to the funds donated by our beloved readers.

Please assist us in the continuation of our work.