Russian Church doesn’t see obstacles to Stalingrad vs. Volgograd referendum

Natalya Mihailova | 09 June 2014
Moscow, June 9, Interfax - Archpriest Vsevolod Chaplin, the head of the Synodal Department for Church and Society Relations, does not see obstacles obstructing a national referendum on whether Volgograd should or should not regain its former name, Stalingrad.
Russian Church doesn’t see obstacles to Stalingrad vs. Volgograd referendum

“I, for one, would prefer the city’s historical name, Tsaritsyn. But I don’t see reasons why people should not be allowed to speak their minds on this issue,” he told Interfax-Religion.

Citizens could be given more opportunities to have their opinions heard, including on matters of social justice, foreign policy, economic set-up and other pressing issues, he said.

“The word ‘Stalingrad’ lives a life of its own, unlinked to Stalin’s name, and is associated with the victory in the Battle of Stalingrad and with part of our history,” Father Vsevolod said.

Concerning the controversy over Stalin, it will continue, including in the Orthodox Christian community, he said, adding that Stalin persecuted the church, while Stalin’s political reprisals “were largely unfair.”

But if the clergy, monastic community and active lay people are polled, quite a few of them will say that there were positive aspects in Stalin’s reign, he continued. “I meet and deal with many people and I know this too well. Let us not forget, besides that, that our patriarch and Synod’s attitude to Stalin’s last years was respectful,” he said.

Father Vsevolod made a point that, “attempts are being made today to manipulate the Stalin issue and Stalin’s reprisals against the Church, in order to rigorously suppress the ultra-liberal position on whether Christians can use force against external and internal enemies of the Fatherland.”

“If we do not try to re-write the Holy Scripture and the Holy Tradition, the answer will be apparent: They can, and even must, sometimes. Associating defense of the Fatherland with Stalin alone would be more than incorrect. The need to defend the Fatherland will arise more than once in the future,” he said.

Throughout history, the holy rulers, holy warriors and righteous kings and military leaders destroyed external and internal enemies, he said. “So, alas, those who are willing to accomplish a pacifist revolution in the Church, translating a theological discussion into the language of online reprimands like “Are you pro-Stalin?” are profoundly wrong,” the priest said.

Since you are here…

…we do have a small request. More and more people visit Orthodoxy and the World website. However, resources for editorial are scarce. In comparison to some mass media, we do not make paid subscription. It is our deepest belief that preaching Christ for money is wrong.

Having said that, Pravmir provides daily articles from an autonomous news service, weekly wall newspaper for churches, lectorium, photos, videos, hosting and servers. Editors and translators work together towards one goal: to make our four websites possible -,, and Therefore our request for help is understandable.

For example, 5 euros a month is it a lot or little? A cup of coffee? It is not that much for a family budget, but it is a significant amount for Pravmir.

If everyone reading Pravmir could donate 5 euros a month, they would contribute greatly to our ability to spread the word of Christ, Orthodoxy, life's purpose, family and society.