“Given the background to how Church and State are getting closer…”, this is the opening phrase of my friend, a secular journalist.
Stop. Just a moment. Why start off with this “Yes, but…”? Why is there always this automatic supposition that Church and State are getting closer? Why do I always have to start off with this mantra?
I am just waiting for the question: “You’re not going to argue about what’s obvious, are you?” Yes, I am.
There is a phrase that journalists like to use: “It’s perfectly obvious that…” This is very convenient: it expresses the thought, so there’s nothing more to argue about. For example: “It’s perfectly obvious that the Church is too close to the State”. Who is it obvious to? Who are all these people, who it’s obvious to? For example, to me it’s not obvious at all.
In January 2011 the Church sent a document to the Ministry of Health and Social Development, called “Proposals for Improvements to the National Policy on Family and Childhood Care”. It contained 25 points. The Ministry “backed” only one of them – for “a week of thought” before an abortion. The Church was very pleased with this. Is that Church and State getting closer?
There is a new subject at school – The Rudiments of Religious Cultures and Secular Ethics. The law says that parents must decide which course they want their children to study: the religious one, the Rudiments of Orthodox Culture (or Muslim, Buddhist or Jewish Culture – as you choose) or non-religious – the Rudiments of Secular Ethics. But a priest from Moscow who knows the system inside out told me in an interview that most schools in Moscow decide top-down: the headteacher says Secular Ethics and so everyone studies that. It is understandable: it is easier to find a teacher for that than one for the Rudiments of Orthodox Culture. Is that Church and State getting closer?
My confessor has been trying to build a church in Moscow for seven years. He’s got all the paperwork, permits and agreements, and constantly has to get new ones. It has taken years for the bureaucratic machine to turn over and for the church to start being built. Seven years! What is that – Church and State getting closer?
Who decided this business – that «the Church and State are getting closer»? Clearly, someone for whom life is life is just big politics, for whom the word “Church” simply means Patriarch Kyrill and the word “State” – Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin. Or at the very least by “Church” they mean the chairmen of the various departments of the Synod and by State – the ministers. And by “getting closer” they mean that in the course of meetings they say hello to each other, as is the convention, and shake hands.
Yes, some bishops do get on well with some government representatives. And why not – are they supposed to shout at each other all the time?
But I am not talking about this. The next time I hear the phrase “It’s perfectly obvious that the Church is getting closer to the State”, I won’t answer: “It’s perfectly obvious that this is not the case”. Unlike in big politics, in real life nothing is ever very obvious.
Translated from the Russian